Couldn't connect to database server.Couldn't find database mixteral_ubhs.An unexpected problem has occured with the application.
SELECT statscurl_id FROM `statscurl` WHERE statscurl_ip = '';

Reduced compared to Maximum : Starcraft 2

add
add add add add

Sc2 next to each other a comparison of reduced settings vs mega settings. Customized Constructed Game addict PERSONAL COMPUTER Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 i5 2500k Sandybridge snabel-a 3.4Ghz by 4 EIGHT GIGABYTES 1600 Ripjaw Storage Sky-blue HI-DEF 6950 two gb Home windows seven Ultimate x64 Software: FRAPS for documenting Sony Las vegas ten for editing
Movie Rating: 4 or 5

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Related Products:

Comments

  1. xXUndeadShadow166Xx says:

    i dont mind playing On Low for my laptop right now because im saving up 1500 for a CyberPower PC Black Pearl one of the best Gaming PCS u can possibly buy…cant fucking wait :) hello ultra here i come ;P

  2. MacDroidify says:

    yay, I can play on high settings easily on my MacBook! and even turn up some of the settings to ultra. Maybe I can run at Max with afterburner and dx11!?!?!?!?!

  3. TheRafmisterio says:

    it’s very different oO

  4. DURPPS145 says:

    whats your average fps in battles at 1080p on ultra

  5. Klingonmastr says:

    I got starcraft 2 and is there a big difference between low and any of the higher quality settings. I have a dual core computer with a GT240 ddr3 video card and 20 inch monitor. The default settings for my system has the graphics set at medium with 1280×720 resolution.

    It seems like setting the resolution higher doesn’t have as great of impact as increasing the graphics settings. Medium seems like it is good enough for most people with low end video cards. Medium does offer some detail.

  6. hfcobra says:

    i think a better comparison would be medium vs ultra, they look almost the same but ultra has quite a bit more of a performance hit for very tiny little imprvements. Plus, i think a lot of people can run this on Medium without too much trouble, imo it is the best setting to play with.

  7. jelloeater100 says:

    Why does low have such a drastic change in coler? The ground looks kinda blue compared to ultra which is grayish.

  8. McsTarget says:

    Thats the best thing about Blizzard, there games even on the lowest settings look good ultra just looks godly :)

  9. GamerGraphicsTV says:

    @iloveplayingpr sounds good

  10. iloveplayingpr says:

    @GamerGraphicsTV
    It runs but not properly though…

    And thanks ! I will tell u later because I will get my computer from repair and got a new graphics card :D

    Though cannot handle High and above settings that much though…

    :/

    Anyways gonna tell you later once I get my computer or new graphics card!

  11. GamerGraphicsTV says:

    @iloveplayingpr There could be a number of reasons why a game wont run, tell me your specs or the name of your computer and I can help.

  12. iloveplayingpr says:

    Why can’t my computer handle medium :/

    And barely handles low… Do you know what is wrong? Graphics card maybe?

    Tell me if you want to know something about it cause I don’t know anything about this kind of things D:

  13. Kicka46 says:

    Sad that I cant have it on High settings though it looks like a great game :D even on low settings it looks well..allright graphics :D

  14. GamerGraphicsTV says:

    @DURPPS145 I really wouldnt suggest it, I would go for at least a 700w PSU, the card itself draws power and hopefully the system you are adding this card to will be equally as powerful so you dont get a bottleneck and that will require more power as well.

    I have a 700w eXtreme power from coolermaster in my system

  15. DURPPS145 says:

    @GamerGraphicsTV alright cause i was gonna get a 6850 and ive seen the fps go from like 30-80, sweet i love 60 fps haha, also do you think a generic 600 watt psu would be enough for it?

Speak Your Mind

Local Events, Concerts, Tickets
Events by Eventful